Alleged Discrimination and Retaliation at Pinterest Lead to Fiduciary Breach Lawsuit
/After agreeing to a settlement in a recent discrimination and retaliation lawsuit, Pinterest is facing more legal trouble. Another lawsuit is making its way through the courts claiming breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, abuse of control, and violation of 14(a) of the Exchange Act. According to the complaint, the allegations in the lawsuit arise from an alleged systemic culture, policy, and practice of illegal discrimination on the basis of race and sex.
All the Details on the Case: Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island v. Silbermann, Sharp, Jordan, Levine, Rajaram, Reynolds, Wilson, Kilgore, Morgenfeld, and Pinterest, Inc. (Nominal Defendant)
Case Number: 3:20-cv-08438
Filed: Nov. 30, 2020
Court: Northern District of California San Francisco Division
The Plaintiffs in the Case: The Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island, derivatively on behalf of Pinterest, Inc.
Defendant: Benjamin Silbermann, Evan Sharp, Jeffrey Jordan, Jeremy Levine, Gokul Rajaram, Fredric Reynolds, Michelle Wilson, Leslie Kilgore, and Todd Morgenfeld, Defendants, and Pinterest, Inc., Nominal Defendant.
Pinterest’s Alleged Discrimination and Retaliation in the Workplace:
The shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in November 2020 in the Northern District of California against Pinterest, Inc. The social media platform is a visual discovery search engine used to collect ideas that went public in April 2019. The cited complaint alleges that the platform executives breached their fiduciary duties to the company by ignoring a systemic (and long-standing) culture of retaliation and discrimination. Allegedly, the company provided unequal salaries to females and racial minorities, and also failed to provide equal promotional opportunities for women based on experience and skill.
Complaint Alleges Four Causes of Action Against Defendants:
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Waste of Corporate Assets
Abuse of Control
Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14A-9
Plaintiffs claim that Pinterest’s top executives boardmembers engaged in, facilitated or knowingly ignored discrimination and retaliation against Pinterest employees who spoke up or attempted to challenge the White, male leadership clique.
Revised Version of the Complaint Filed December 31, 2020:
After the district judge assigned ordered the parties involved to revise the “copious redactions” in the original complaint, a revised version was filed on December 31, 2020. In the revised complaint, certain allegations are now public including the claim that the Pinterest Compensation Committee was aware of the inconsistent pay practices in place at Pinterest, but did not take action to oversee any discriminatory pay complaints.
If you have questions about California labor law violations or how employment law protects you against labor law violations, please get in touch with Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Experienced employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in any one of various law firm offices located in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago.