Seeking Justice: Lawsuit Claims PAQ, Inc. Failed to Pay Full Wages

PAQ, Inc. is under legal scrutiny regarding wage compliance issues after Lorenzo Sibley filed a California employment law class action.

The Case: Lorenzo Sibley vs. PAQ, Inc.

The Court: San Joaquin County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: STK-CV-UOE-2024-14148

The Plaintiff: Lorenzo Sibley vs. PAQ, Inc.

The plaintiff, Lorenzo Sibley, filed a class action complaint alleging that PAQ, Inc. violated the California Labor Code.

The Defendant: Lorenzo Sibley vs. PAQ, Inc.

The defendant, PAQ, Inc., allegedly failed to reimburse employees for required business expenses. Allegedly, this resulted in inaccurate and incomplete wages and wage statements. The allegations listed in the lawsuit include failing to pay minimum wage, failing to pay overtime wages, failing to pay wages when due, failing to reimburse employees for required business expenses, failing to provide workers with rest periods and meal breaks, and failing to provide workers with accurate itemized wage statements. These allegations would constitute violations of numerous California Labor Code Sections, including 201-203, 226, 226.7, 233, 246, 510, 512, 1194, 1197, 1197.1, 2802, and the applicable Wage Order(s).

What Steps Should You Take if You Aren't Paid Your Full Wages?

If you suspect you haven't been paid your full wages, here are practical steps to help you reach a satisfactory resolution:

• Track Your Hours: Gather documentation of your work hours to compare it against the company's records.

• Check Your Pay Stubs: When you are issued a pay stub, always check it for accuracy against your records.

• Discuss Discrepancies with HR: Discuss discrepancies with your company's HR department.

• File a Wage Claim: If the issue is not resolved internally, talk to a local employment law attorney about filing a wage claim.

Taking these steps helps secure your wages and reinforces the importance of fair labor practices within the workplace.

The Case: Lorenzo Sibley vs. PAQ, Inc.

The case, Lorenzo Sibley vs. PAQ, Inc., is currently pending in the San Joaquin County Superior Court of the State of California.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Knight Group Class Action Lawsuit Addresses California Worker Concerns

A recently filed class action alleges Knight Group violated labor law, leaving Californian workers with wage and hour concerns.

The Case: Michelle Phan vs. Knight Sacramento

The Court: Sacramento County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24CV016958

The Plaintiff: Michelle Phan vs. Knight Sacramento

The plaintiff, Michelle Phan, filed a class action. Eligible class members are those employed by Knight Group as non-exempt, exempt, piece-rate-based, and/or commission-based employees in California from August 27, 2020, to the present. Some of these employees were allegedly entitled to additional hourly compensation to compensate for time spent performing any non-sales-related duties directed by Knight Group during their work shifts. Some employees are also due one hour of pay for their missed rest periods.

The Defendant: Michelle Phan vs. Knight Sacramento

The defendant, Knight Sacramento, operated car dealerships. The class action claims they violated multiple labor laws with standard operating practices that resulted in:

• failing to pay minimum wage

• failing to provide workers with rest periods

• failing to provide workers with meal breaks

• failing to reimburse employees for necessary business expenses

• failing to provide employees with accurate itemized wage statements

• failing to provide employees with wages when due

Do California Workers Get Rest Periods and Meal Breaks?

Yes, California employees should receive rest periods and meal breaks. If your employer does not offer you meal breaks and rest periods:

• Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with California labor laws regarding meal and rest breaks to understand what is owed to you.

• Keep Records: Document all instances where breaks were denied or cut short.

• Report Violations: Inform your HR department or supervisor about the missed breaks and request compliance with the law.

• Join the Class Action: If a class action is already in progress, consider joining it to address the violations collectively.

• Find an Attorney: Talk to an employment law attorney about your legal options.

The Case: Michelle Phan vs. Knight Sacramento

The case, Michelle Phan vs. Knight Sacramento, is currently pending in the Sacramento County Superior Court of the State of California.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Challenging Break Violations: Class Action Lawsuit Against Pureserve Building Services

Pureserve Building Services faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly failing to provide its employees with legally mandated meal and rest breaks, highlighting critical labor rights issues.

The Case: Petra Rios vs. Pureserve Building Services, Inc.

The Court: Monterey County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24CV003470

The Plaintiff: Petra Rios vs. Pureserve Building Services, Inc.

The plaintiff, Petra Rios, filed a class action complaint claiming that Pureserve Building Services violated the California Labor Code by failing to pay workers for all of their hours. Rios worked for Purserve Building Services from July 2023 to September 2023.

The Defendant: Petra Rios vs. Pureserve Building Services, Inc.

The defendant, Pureserve Building Services, Inc., is a California janitorial services company with operations in Monterey, where the plaintiff worked. The company faces numerous labor law violation allegations, including:

• failing to pay minimum wages

• failing to pay overtime wages

• failing to provide required meal and rest periods

• failing to pay wages when due

• failed to comply with itemized wage statement requirements

• failing to reimburse for required business expenses

What Are Your Rights When Denied Meal and Rest Breaks?

If your California employer is denying your legally mandated meal and rest breaks, here are steps to protect your rights:

• Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with California labor laws regarding meal and rest breaks to understand what is owed to you.

• Keep Records: Document all instances where breaks were denied or cut short.

• Report Violations: Inform your HR department or supervisor about the missed breaks and request compliance with the law.

• Join the Class Action: If a class action is ongoing, consider joining it to address the violations collectively.

• Talk to an Attorney: Talk to an experienced employment law attorney, so they can point out any options for legal recourse.

Taking these steps can help secure the breaks you are entitled to and potentially recover damages for violations that have already occurred.

The Case: Petra Rios vs. Pureserve Building Services, Inc.

The case is currently pending in the Monterey County Superior Court of the State of California.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Terra Vista Management Faces Labor Code Violation Allegations

In a recent California class action, Terra Vista Management faces allegations of failing to pay its employees for all hours worked, sparking a broader discussion on compliance with California's Labor Code.

The Case: Shane Andersen vs. Terra Vista Management

The Court: San Diego County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24CU006415C

The Plaintiff: Shane Andersen vs. Terra Vista Management

The plaintiff, Shane Andersen, filed a class action against Terra Vista Management, claiming they violated labor law. Andersen claimed the company failed to comply with labor law requirements for rest periods, meal breaks, minimum wage, and overtime pay.

The Defendant: Shane Andersen vs. Terra Vista Management

The defendant in the case is Terra Vista Management. The defendant's standard business practices allegedly required employees to miss meal breaks and rest periods regularly. According to the complaint, the company's standard business practices left employees missing rest periods and meal breaks, and plaintiffs also claimed the company failed to pay them for all the hours they worked.

How to Address Unpaid Wages When Your Employer Fails to Compensate for All Time Worked?

If you suspect your California employer has not compensated you for all the time you've worked, there are several steps you can take to address the issue:

• Review Your Pay Stubs: To identify discrepancies, compare pay stubs against your work schedule.

• Document Your Hours: Keep detailed records of your work hours; include your start and end times.

• Speak to HR: Discuss discrepancies you identify with your human resources department for clarification and potential resolution.

• Consult an Attorney: If the problem is not addressed internally, seek legal advice to understand your rights and discuss filing a wage claim.

These steps can help ensure you receive all the wages you are entitled to under the law.

The Case: Shane Andersen vs. Terra Vista Management

The case is currently pending in the San Diego County Superior Court of the State of California.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Former Employee Files Wage and Hour Complaint: Did Nexstar Violate Labor La

A former employee recently filed a complaint claiming that while working for Nexstar Broadcasting, the company did not provide full compensation according to labor law.

The Case: Steven Radford vs. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

The Court: San Francisco County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: CGC-24-618978

The Plaintiff: Steven Radford vs. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

The plaintiff, Steven Radford, worked for Nexstar from March 2017 to November 28, 2023, as a nonexempt hourly employee entitled to labor law protections. During Radford's time at the company, he claims he did not receive accurate wage statements or full compensation for his hours. Radford recently filed a class action claiming that Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.'s business practices violated the California Labor Code.

The Defendant: Steven Radford vs. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

The defendant, Steven Radford vs. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., operates, programs, and provides sales and services to various California television stations. The company allegedly failed to keep an accurate record of employee hours. As a result, this resulted in inaccurate and incomplete wages and wage statements (allegedly violating California Labor Code § 226). According to the California class action, Nexstar required workers to work off the clock and did not provide payment for all the time their employees spent under their control. Since the time worked off the clock wasn't included in overtime premium payment calculations, the plaintiff claims the company failed to pay minimum wage as required (allegedly violating Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1194, 1197, and 1197.1).

What Can You Do If Your Employer Doesn't Pay You Your Full Wages?

If you are a California worker, and your employer has not paid you the full wages you are due, start by documenting any discrepancies with work records, pay stubs, emails, etc. that show the hours you worked in comparison to the hours documented for your pay. Talk to your HR department about the issue. Hopefully, it can be resolved internally. If the problem persists, you may need to file a wage claim. Talk to a local employment law attorney to explore your legal options.

The Case: Steven Radford vs. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

The plaintiff filed the case in California's San Francisco County Superior Court, where it is still pending.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Global Paratransit Allegedly Provided Employees with Incomplete Wages

According to a recently filed complaint, Global Paratransit, Inc. allegedly failed to record their employees' hours worked accurately, and as a result, employees claim they received inaccurate wage statements and incomplete wages for the time they worked.

The Case: Alejandro Galindo vs. Global Paratransit, Inc.

The Court: Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24STCV31314

The Plaintiff: Alejandro Galindo vs. Global Paratransit, Inc.

The plaintiff, Alejandro Galindo, was employed by the defendant in the case from December 21, 2023 to June 28, 2024. As a non-exempt hourly employee, Galindo was entitled to the protections provided by labor law, including meal breaks, rest periods, minimum wage, overtime pay, etc. Galindo filed a class action on behalf of himself and other employees at the company in similar work situations.

The Defendant: Alejandro Galindo vs. Global Paratransit, Inc.

The defendant, Global Paratransit, Inc., provides transport services throughout California. According to the plaintiff, Galindo, Global Paratransit, Inc. violated the California Labor Code. According to the class action complaint, the company allegedly required their workers to complete off-the-clock work by having them work during their "off-duty" meal breaks and requiring completion of mandatory COVID-19 screening tests before clocking in for a shift. Additionally, the plaintiffs claim that the company engaged in a standard practice of rounding the time their employees worked - always to the company's benefit. As a result, employees claim Global Paratransit, Inc. paid workers less than they would have received if they were paid for their actual hours worked.

What to Do If Your Employer Doesn't Record Your Hours Correctly and Pays You Less Than You Earned?

If you suspect that your employer is not recording your hours correctly and, as a result, you're being paid less than what you've earned, you should first gather documentation that supports your claim. Helpful supporting documents include:

• Timesheets

• Emails referencing your hours, scheduling, etc.

• Witness statements that support your claim

It's usually a good idea to discuss your concern with the HR department or your direct supervisor to request clarification; you could see a quick response, including adjusted pay for inaccurately recorded hours. If the problem isn't addressed internally, consult with an employment law attorney. An experienced attorney can help you discuss the process to file a complaint and recover your unpaid wages.

The Case: Alejandro Galindo vs. Global Paratransit, Inc.

The plaintiff filed the case, Alejandro Galindo vs. Global Paratransit, Inc., in California's Los Angeles County Superior Court where it is currently pending.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour class action lawsuit, please get in touch with Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Alameda County Superior Court to Consider Claims Armorous Violated Labor Law

Do Armorous business practices violate labor law? A former employee's class action complaint brings the question to the attention of the Alameda County California Superior Court, where the issues will be considered.

The Case: Brandon Stocker v. Armorous

The Court: Alameda County Superior Court

The Case No.: 24CV096396

The Plaintiff: Brandon Stocker v. Armorous

The plaintiff, Brandon Stocker, was employed by Armorous from August 2023 through April 2024 as a non-exempt hourly employee eligible for labor law protections. After noticing uniform policies and practices in place at the company that failed to comply with minimum wage, meal break/rest period, and overtime pay requirements, Stocker filed a wage and hour class action lawsuit to seek relief for his own and other employees' economic injuries.

The Defendant: Brandon Stocker v. Armorous

The defendant, Armorous, is a California corporation that owns and operates a security company. According to the class action complaint, the company failed to labor law compliant meal breaks and rest periods, failed to compensate employees for missed meal breaks and rest periods accurately, failed to pay workers for all their time worked, failed to provide compensation for off the clock work, failed to calculate overtime pay rates accurately, failed to provide workers with the required itemized wage statements, and failed to reimburse workers for necessary work expenses.

How Should California Employers Compensate for Missed Meal Breaks?

Non-exempt California employees are entitled to a 30-minute meal break if they work more than five hours in one day and a second 30-minute break if they work over ten hours. The breaks must be uninterrupted and free of all work duties. California employers who fail to provide an eligible employee with their legally required, off-duty meal break must compensate them for the missed break. According to labor law, the required compensation is one additional hour of pay at the worker's regular rate for each day a meal break isn't provided.

The Case: Brandon Stocker v. Armorous

According to the class action lawsuit, Armorous allegedly violated Labor Code §§ 201, 202, 203, 204, 210, 226, 226.7, 510, 512, 558, 1194, 1197, 1197.1, 1198, and 2802. The case is currently pending in the Alameda County Superior Court.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour lawsuit, don't hesitate to contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Discuss your situation today with one of the experienced employment law attorneys in our various law firm offices in Chicago, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and Riverside.